|
Lake and Burtynsky are both cognizant and attentive to power relations.
Their works are metaphors of conflicts which are meaningful to the individual
and, for both artists, social and political conditions consistently relate
back to the personal. The human body, specifically the female body, is
Lake's locus of attention in examining these terms of reference. Burtynsky
relates his identity and by extension his viewers, as like-minded consumers,
to the landscape, particularly the industrially-defined landscape. The selection of Burtynsky's photographs in this exhibition is drawn
from his series entitled Mines, Railcuts, and Homesteads. After completing
a degree in multimedia at Ryerson Polytechnical Institute, these are among
the subjects he examined during trips to western Canada in 1983, and again
in 1985. Burtynsky formed this body of images to convey the means by which
humans claimed a vast geographic territory in an extraordinarily brief
period of time, in geological terms. By focussing on the rail, industry,
and homes, the photographs mimetically structure Burtynsky's view of our
tripartite encroachment on the land: transportation, mechanization, and
domestication. |
At the same time, through a friend who mined iron-ore, Burtynsky saw
open-pit mining. Burtynsky then utilized his affinity for industries which
form the core of Canada's resource-based economy to reestablish a link
between himself, his viewers, and the activities which support his and
their lifestyles. He seeks to reconnect us with the places we inhabit
and the products we have. Burtynsky believes that "We don't really
know what the 'other' of that is, or what the effect of that is on the
landscape
I want to go back and show those kinds of places, in a
kind of poetic way. I'm saying 'Isn't this interesting' and 'This speaks
about those places we don't usually inhabit, we don't usually go to.'"
|
Similar questions arise in Railcuts #6, Railcut off Hwy 8. Spences Bridge,
British Columbia, for which Burtynsky utilized a reductive, modernist
aesthetic comparable to Lake's formulation of A True Space. By ordering
the objects in this landscape, Burtynsky restricted the referent to an
engineered line which seems subtly placed on the perpendicular face of
the mountain. He shows how humans have interjected and entered, like a
puncture in the midst of a sublime landscape. Even so, we are compellingly
decentered from any sense of scale. The presence of a train or telephone
poles in other Railcuts in the series solidifies our sense of human activity
in a setting which could initially be read as pure nature. Yet, Burtynsky
does not attempt to use his photographs to implicate viewers in the traditionally
combative discourse between humans and nature. He suggests we co-exist
and that this is a natural manifestation of our identity, linked to the
inevitability of progress and culture. ![]() |
|
|
||
| Previous  Next |